Showing posts with label The DUnwich Horror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The DUnwich Horror. Show all posts

Thursday, August 25, 2011

THE COMPARE AND CONTRAST OF TWO MYTHOS MOVIES

THE COMPARE AND CONTRAST OF TWO MYTHOS MOVIES
DARKNESS (2002) AND THE DUNWICH HORROR (1970)


Darkness directed by Jaume Balaguero
   Cast: Anna Paquin  - Regina
            Lena Olin - Maria
   Plot: Regina and her family move into a old countryside home only to discover that the house has a dark  past that is trying to reappear. That past is something ancient and dark.


The Dunwich Horror directed by Daniel Haller
     Cast: Dean Stockwell - Wilbur Whateley
              Ed Bagley - Dr. Henry Armitage
    Plot: Wilbur Whateley wants to help the Old Ones break through by consulting the Necronomicon, and Armitage must stop him.

REVIEW:
     I was talking to someone I work with about running out of time to get as many reviews out as possible I can this month and my realization I wasn't going to be able to review all the movies I wanted to due to certain reasons including that I have to work and that I keep finding other movies that I would love to review. Then he mentioned that maybe I should do more of an article review where I do a comparison and contrast of two movies, one from the 70's and one more recent. I thought about it and decided that that was actually a good idea so where I can actually get two reviews out at one time.


     As Mythos movies can range widely about what the actual plot can be about, I think it is best explained that the most common and recurring theme is the human insignificance to the universe and the degradation of mental capacity when faced with the otherworldly concepts or cosmic outsideness. This can interpreted in any number of ways by the filmmakers. From the ripping of reality to bringing about a Elder God, the final days of the world as things and people go crazy by the effects of  cosmic research or intrusion, or the search for  control of a otherworldly deity which they know not what the true price will be. There can be many different plots and concepts that can be categorized as Mythos.  The most common theme or plot is that of the main characters finding a cosmic or unnatural presence and them trying to find someway to stop it. Or in some cases trying to come to terms with what is happening  around them while trying to stay alive.


     One thing that is usually overlooked in Mythos movies is that the said supernatural or otherworldly force  in Lovecraft's works don't see mankind as much of anything. They can be described as beyond human understanding, as to understand them is to go insane. While some movies just basically come right out say they are Mythos, some are more subtle in the way events transgress and the flow of disaster that happens due to 'Cosmic' disturbances. Which is why I picked the two movies I did for this piece. One right out broadcasts it is a Mythos movie while the other is just because of the subtleness of  what transpires I see as being influenced by the Mythos and has the heart of the Mythos at it's core.


     The thing that both movies have in common is the completion of a ritual to bring something over. In The Dunwich Horror it is to bring over the Older God Yog-Sothoth achieved by way of the Necronomicon. With the Darkness, the ritual itself is almost complete except for the blood of one person to bring about the return of  an older age with Older Gods. Of course with both movies at about halfway through each one the main characters, Regina in Darkness and Dr. Armitage go through a period of discovery of the past in which they both find out that one of the family members is the cause all the deaths and unexplained happenings that are occurring. These points on the movies are all that are really the same, with of course the eclipse that is about to happen during each ritual.


     Now the things that are different are numerous between the two on the story front as well. With Dunwich Horror, almost everything is spelled out from the start as you know Whateley is trying to perform a ritual and he needs the Necronomicon to actually complete it. For Darkness though, you find out throughout the movie that there needs to be a completion of a ritual that was started 40 years ago. While with Dunwich the story basically follows Whateley around as he tries to have sex with Sandra Dee's character and it shows a lot of dancing naked cult members, it just seems that they are there to just fill out time. With Darkness though, Regina knows something isn't right and decides to investigate the house she just moved into while outside forces are moving to help complete the ritual that it wants finished. Over at Dunwich the Whateley's monstrous brother is aching to get out and is never really seen that much except for when it eats a girl in flashes.  In Darkness the forces let themselves be seen only when surrounded by darkness which takes on a much more subtle terror.


     While The Dunwich Horror is based directly off of a Lovecraft story, Darkness is based around the mythos. The biggest difference in the two is the way both films play out. Dunwich Horror just drags along and nothing is really suspenseful in anything that it does. On the other hand Darkness has a pace that is set on purpose to create at first suspense then a feeling of dread. Darkness has the feeling in it I got after actually reading Lovecraft's stories which most movies based directly on his work do not have, yet this one does. Another difference in the movies is, to be blunt, The Dunwich Horror is just boring and feels like it is going nowhere, while Darkness has the power to keep you interested even though it moves at a deliberate pace. The last main difference in the two is that Darkness just has a sense of actually darkness and evil to it that is missing completely from The Dunwich Horror.


     So if you are giving a choice of these two movies to watch one night and nothing else, pass on The Dunwich Horror even though it is based on a story, but instead uses poor acting and a sex obsessed story to ruin a established story. The Darkness though uses Lovecraft's themes of fate, inherited guilt, as well the influence of 'Outside' forces are all in effect, coupled with this is a much stronger story and great acting to make a criminally overlooked Mythos film.


BEST DEATH:
  The Dunwich Horror:
     Wilbur's shocking ritualistic fail.


  Darkness:
      Closeup of a throat being slit that represents Mark's death.


BEST LINE:
  The Dunwich Horror:
      Yes, why not? Look around. You'll see what's there. Fear. And frightened people who kill what they can't understand. 
     
  Darkness:
    I don't like the dark here, it keeps eating my pencils.

FUN FACTS:
   The Dunwich Horror:
     Peter Fonda turned down the role of Wilbur Whateley.

  Darkness:
     Miramax/Dimension had paid $4 million for the rights to distribute the movie in North America and some other territories, but then shelved it for more than two years. The company gave the film a US theatrical release at Christmas 2004 after heavy editing to secure a PG-13 rating. The version I used for this article is the unrated edition of the film.

Friday, August 12, 2011

WITCHES: THE DARKEST EVIL


WITCHES: THE DARKEST EVIL (THE DUNWICH HORROR) (2009)
US
Directed by Leigh Scott

CAST:
Griff Furst - Professor Walter Rice
Sarah Lieving - Professor Fay Morgan
Dean Stockwell - Dr. Henry Armitage

PLOT:
     In Louisiana, the thirty-five year old single mother Lavina delivers a evil into the world. Ten years later, Dr. Henry Armitage and his assistant Professor Fay Morgan discover that portlas are being opened to bring forth the Old Gods and must enlist the help of skeptic Professor Walter Rice to help them.


REVIEW:
      When  I first heard they were making a a new version of The Dunwich Horror I must admit that I wasn't that excited about it. Then I found out that Jeffrey Combs and Dean Stockwell were both cast to be in it. Needless to say, my expectations were slightly raised due to this. You have Combs who just seems like if there is a American produced Lovecraft film it seems as if he will be in it. Then there's Stockwell who was in the 1970's version of the movie. Problem was, I just couldn't find the movie no matter what. Maybe it was a sign that I shouldn't try to find it. And here we are two years later and you're reading my review of it. So hold on, it's going to be a bumpy ride.


     Wow. I have never seen Dean Stockwell act this bad before. If he was trying to show emotion I could not tell as  every single face gesture was exactly the same. Well the only time it changed was after he got a face to face meeting with Yog-Sothoth. The after effect is just laughable it's so bad. Now as for Jeffrey Combs as Wilbur Whateley I can't tell if he hated being in the role or just couldn't decide what to do with his character for most of it. I really don't want to hate on Combs, but his acting was nowhere near where it should have been. Thankfully, all was not completely terrible on the acting front, the two bright spots in the whole movie were Griff Furst's Professor Walter Rice and Sarah Lieving's Professor Fay Morgan. These two were the most believable actors in the whole movie's run time as it actually seemed they were having fun in their roles. The one draw back is Furst's delivery of the most stupidest line in the whole movie. Yep, it is groan worthy!


     Now on to director Leigh Scott. I don't know what he was trying to do but the only time it worked is when the two Professors went into the Ward house. Other than that the camera work is shotty and jumpy. The action scenes are unwatchable or just isn't shown at all. It seems as if Scott watched Rob Zombie's House Of A Thousand Corpses before he made the movie, the reason why I say this is that whenever the movie goes to the Whateley house, the camera gets really jumpy, the film fades to black, and there are time slips which just confused me as it seems like all these things were put in for no reason, except to make the Whateley family seem more weird than they all ready are. There was just no reason that I could see Scott filming these scenes that way as it is confusing and to me is lazy.


     My biggest problem with the movie is that, even though it is based on a Lovecraft story it doesn't mean it will be better by throwing in all the Old Gods and Deities names. By doing this it seems like the writer was trying to impress the people that would watch this movie and it get's old quickly. Now for the special effects. Well they do have some in there, but it's all crap for the most part. Also to the writer, explain how exactly Stockwell got the power to shoot lighting out of his fingertips please. I really want to know. And as for the creature Yog-Sothoth, what was with the purple cloud he was always surrounded in. It made it look like the creature was made out of a tennis ball with paper machete attached to it. I could go on, but I'm not going to. So I'll just say it's best to avoid this movie if at all possible.

BEST DEATH:
     It's kinda sad that there really isn't any deaths shown in great detail on screen, so I'll just show put a picture of Combs' final moment instead.


BEST LINE:
     That is not dead can eternal lie,
     And with strange aeons even death may die.

FUN FACTS:
     A afro'd Dean Stockwell, who plays Dr. Armitage in this film, played the role of Wilbur Whateley in the 1970 version.

     Filmed in Lafayette, Louisiana.